JCB to build diesels: four-cylinder diesels 72 to 120 hp to
debut in 2005; first uses are JCB machines; "we tend to do
things ourselves"
Diesel Progress North American Edition,
Oct, 2003 by Mike Osenga
The rumors have finally come true. After at least 25 years of
speculation, rumors and assertions to the contrary, England's
JCB will become a manufacturer of diesel engines in 2005. And
with that, the son has made his father's dream a reality.
The late Joseph C. Bamford, founder of the privately-held
company that bears his initials, had a strong interest in
diesels and continually looked for ways to incorporate a JCB
engine into his machines, spawning the many rumors. Yet it is
his son, Sir Anthony Bamford, chairman and managing director,
who will finally put a JCB-built diesel into a production JCB
machine.
"We've toyed around with engines for a long time," Bamford said.
"Engines were something very much in my father's blood, but he
was practical and responsible about it. He didn't want to make
engines just to say he was making engines. That's how I feel as
well. That's why we haven't, until now, made diesel engines.
This is an essential product."
The announcement is something unique in today's diesel engine
industry. This is a clean sheet of paper effort from design to
manufacturing to the philosophy behind the hardware. No
partners, no shared equity--brand new engines built in a newly
tooled facility--all owned by JCB.
The Rocester, U.K., manufacturer of construction and
agricultural equipment will launch a line of four-cylinder (and
eventually six-cylinder) diesels with initial outputs flora 72
to 120 hp. The new diesels will be produced at an existing JCB
facility in Cheadle, England, that is being retooled for
assembly of engines. JCB will continue to source engines from
Perkins in outputs smaller than its own models and from Isuzu
and Cummins for larger machines.
"It is no secret that JCB has been looking at developing engines
for 25 years at least," said John Patterson, JCB group chief
executive. "There have been various generations of engines, as
well as prototypes developed over the years. But in the final
analysis, on previous occasions, the company just never had the
volume to support an engine production program.
"If you look at the development of JCB over the last 10 years in
terms of its product range expansion, its market expansions, its
presence in markets and its global market share growth, the
economics of an engine program make much more sense now against
the growth factors we enjoy and project for the future"
"We just feel that it is important to have our own engines,
given the larger volumes of machines we manufacture," said
Bamford. "If you look at our competitors, they also haw their
own engines. We also make many of our own axles and gearboxes,
so we know how to make components and are confident we can make
engines competitively--engines designed for the particular
characteristics of off-highway machinery."
The current engine program has been underway for about five
years with the final decision to proceed made in March. Both
Bamford and Patterson stressed that the engines are designed
primarily for use in JCB machines. Sales of JCB diesels to other
manufacturers is a part, but not a major driver, in the
development of the engines.
"Our first priority is to get into production for our own
product needs," Patterson said. "After that we can look to other
user sales."
Patterson added that International Transmissions Limited, JCB's
gearbox and axle manufacturing subsidiary, had about 20 percent
of its sales to third parties. "I would be disappointed, in due
course, if we didn't enjoy the same sort of ratio with engines,"
he said.
JCB-first was also a driving factor in the design of the new
engines. "The thing that makes these engines unique is that they
have been developed primarily for our own use in off-highway
equipment," said Dr. Tim Leverton, group engineering director.
"Because it is not part of our business plan to have to sell the
engines on-highway to make the plan work, we have been able to
not have any compromises in our focus on the use of these
engines in off-highway machines."
The first three engine models to be manufactured by JCB will all
be in line, four-cylinder, four valve-percylinder, direct
injection diesels. The smallest output model will be a naturally
aspirated engine developing 72 hp at 2200 rpm. There will also
be a turbocharged model with an output of up to 99 hp at 2200
rpm, while the largest initial model will be a turbocharged,
charge-air cooled configuration rated 120 hp at 2200 rpm.
This first JCB engine has been designed with 67 cu.in, per
cylinder (1.1 L/cyl). The swept volume is 268 cu.in. (4.4 L).
Peak torque of the three models is 228, 313 and 387 lb.ft.
respectively, all at 1300 rpm.
All of the new models are conservatively rated, almost extremely
conservatively, leaving room for future expansion. A line of
six-cylinder diesels will also be manufactured, but likely not
until around Tier 3 ha 2007 to 2008.
The three initial engine models will debut with a Delphi DP210
rotary mechanical fuel injection pump. Common rail systems are
currently being tested for possible inclusion on Tier 3 engines.
Selected prototypes will be in machines by the end of this year,
with production due to begin in 2005.
Patterson would not specify which JCB machines and when specific
models would switch to the new diesels, saying only that all
machines in the 80 to 120 hp range would be changed over by
early 2006. Based on JCB's current machine production, this
would likely include the company's line of rough terrain
forklifts, some tracked excavator models, some wheeled loaders,
the Loadall product line and the entire backhoe loader line,
JCB's core machines.
The impact of the announcement of this new entrant into the
diesel engine world cannot be understated. It was a surprise to
most, despite the many previous rumors and created an industry
wide buzz immediately after the initial announcement.
Despite the speculation around JCB engine activities over the
years, conventional industry wisdom said such a launch was now
unlikely, maybe even foolhardy, given the realities of the world
diesel industry today.
Conventional industry wisdom said there is too much global
capacity to justify another diesel manufacturer. That same
wisdom would suggest that JCB, with current machine production
levels of around 30,000 units, does not have the internal
volumes to support an investment in diesel technology. And given
the increasingly tighter emissions regulations coming in the
future, the costs of development and staying current would be a
major barrier to entry.
Even beyond those factors, the prevailing winds today favor
spreading development costs and risks out by partnering, joint
venturing or forming third party manufacturers. Almost anything
except going it alone, as JCB has now done.
As expected, JCB, which has always marched to its own drummer,
is well aware of current industry drinking and sees things in a
different light.
"I think if you look, the economics am driven by the historical
knowledge that to be in the engine manufacturing business, yon
have to have large transfer lines and dedicated machining
centers to support the high volumes," Patterson said. "I think
modern day technology, in terms of assembly systems and so
forth, doesn't require that type of investment. You can
manufacture much lower volumes with less investment."
"One of the reasons for doing this," Patterson added, "is it
gives us cost control of a strategic component. It just seems to
me, moving forward, the cost premiums you may have to bear in
the future when buying engines will be extremely expensive.
"We have been designing engines for a long time. One of the
benefit of that is that we can talk, with some intelligence, to
potential suppliers in great detail. As a result, this present
design of engines is of remarkable value."
What is remarkable is that Patterson said JCB's total investment
in its diesel engine program, including retooling the production
facility, was $75 to $80 million.
"We are starting with a clean sheet of paper which allows you to
take a look at things differently and as a result we are not
burdened by history" Bamford said. "If you look at other diesel
manufacturers, how much do they actually manufacture inhouse
today?
"Manufacturing is not quite what it was. If you look at the
automotive business, as opposed to off-highway, a lot of runs
are very short. There are lots of specialist engines that are
manufactured in short runs."
Patterson said that the engine design is suitable for Tier 2 and
Tier 3 and any changes associated with Tier 3 will be relatively
minor. "The introduction of Tier 2 and Tier 3 was an influencing
factor on our timing as well. We wouldn't want to be coming in
mid-stream between two legislative changes" he said. "That was
definitely a factor in the timing of it."
"Designing engines for our machines was the major reason we did
this, but the timing in terms of emissions legislation was
certainly important" Bamford said. "You don't want to do it
three times over. And now, the design of the machines is not
going to change radically."
"If you track the history of JCB, you'll see we've always
continued to invest heavily, even in downturns. So when the
cycle turns up, the company comes out of it very strong,"
Patterson said. "You could put this into the same category that
it will strengthen us as we go forward. It's a natural evolution
of our business."
Commenting on the possibilities of a joint development program,
Bamford noted that, "there have been opportunities to partner."
"There are certain companies with which we've had deep
discussions," Bamford said. "However, we tend to do things
ourselves. Our time scale is different. We want to get on with
making this engine for our own requirements to satisfy our own
needs, now, in our timeframe."
In looking at the design of the new JCB diesels, more complete
details of which will follow in a future issue of Diesel
Progress, Leverton said there is a strong focus on a robust,
simple design tailored to the operating hours and life
expectancy of off highway equipment.
JCB made extensive use of outside consultants in the design of
the engines. The company worked closely with Ricardo Consulting
Engineers from "day one" Patterson said. AVL List GmbH did
significant work on emissions and the combustion system, while
Cosworth Technology advised on how to optimize designs for
machining on the basis that they will continue to be a supplier.
The first things that jump off the specification sheet are the
noise levels. JCB said the maximum noise level for the three
models is 89 dB(A) with an idle noise level of 78 dB(A).
"The engines have a bedplate construction, so the bottom end of
the engine is very stiff," Leverton said. "This, combined with
the stuctural strength of the crankcase itself, is the main
reason we have been able to achieve our noise targets."
A second noticeable design factor is low end torque. "We have
really concentrated on optimizing low engine speed torque so
that we feel we have a significant advantage in terms of low
engine speed torque performance, which is exactly what is needed
to improve the operating performance of the machines," Leverton
said.
He added that in the torque curves, "peak torque is at a similar
engine speed, the difference is the higher torque at 1000 rpm so
you have a much flatter torque characteristic right from step
off. That's really what the operator feels when he's using the
machine."
Obviously, emissions overrides all diesel designs these days and
thus the four valves-per-cylinder design, though Patterson said,
with less machining content than many two valve/cylinder
designs. The new engines have the ability to handle cylinder
pressures in the 2500 psi region, an obvious future emissions
consideration.
Other notable design features include a rear geartrain, another
noise reduction consideration, with an SAE No. 3 flange,
centrally positioned in jectors, a sound deadened steel oil pan,
an 80 hp rear power takeoff; with a second, 10 hp pto.
The front of the engine has an autotensioned poly-vee belt
drive. There is also a direct-mounted alternator, integrated
water pump and the crankcase will have a closed ventilation
system, the latter an increasingly important requirement,
especially in North America.
The Tier 3 engines will probably include a common rail fuel
system with a high pressure fuel pump and an electronic control
module. While a common rail Tier 3 model was on test during our
visit to Rocester, the final decisions on the fuel system for
Tier 3 has not been made and there is the possibility that at
least some models will continue with a mechanical fuel pump.
Lean manufacturing principles have been used throughout and
extensive FMEA analysis on the complete assembly process was
conducted. Minimal automation will be used at first.
There will also be a strong emphasis on cleanliness in the
positive air pressure production area with 10 micron air
filtration. Plans call for all engine production to be hot
tested in two cells.
Current engine development testing is being done at Rocester,
where about 50,000 hours of testing has been done on the engines
through September 2003, divided between test cells and machines.
Once the engines are in production, JCB's global dealer network
will service the new diesels with support from Delphi's network
for the fuel injection system.
By 2005, JCB will manufacture its own engines, transmissions and
axles, the three largest cost components in its machines. Are
engines yet another step towards even more vertical integration?
"We don't want to grow by vertically integrating" Bamford said.
"We want to grow by having end products. We would much prefer to
buy components from very good suppliers. We're not ambitious to
be vertically integrated."
Finally, the launch of the first-ever JCB diesels is set against
a backdrop of a recent series of somewhat quiet, but sweeping
changes in the overall structure of JCB. Since 1998, JCB has:
Ended its joint venture with Sumitomo for production of
hydraulic excavators, and continued on its own.
* Opened JCB Earthmovers.
* Opened the JCB World Parts Centre in Uttoxeter.
* Established its first two non-U.K. manufacturing sites in
Savannah, Ga., and more recently in Brazil.
* Earlier this year took 100 percent control of its Indian
business.
All of which are signs of a company continuing to change with
the times, and invest in its future, even in the face of
conventional industry wisdom.